Pricing + creditsPPT/PDF exportUse-case fitUpdated June 2026

Tome vs Gamma (June 2026)

If you searched “tome vs gamma” in 2026, the biggest difference is availability: Gamma is an active product with clear pricing, credits, and exports, while “Tome” is ambiguous because the original Tome presentation product appears to have been discontinued. This page shows what you can verify today (with dates), and how to choose based on the output you actually need.

Tome vs Gamma: the facts that decide it

Edit this deck →
Tome vs Gamma (June 2026) slide 1Tome vs Gamma (June 2026) slide 2Tome vs Gamma (June 2026) slide 3Tome vs Gamma (June 2026) slide 4Tome vs Gamma (June 2026) slide 5Tome vs Gamma (June 2026) slide 6
1 / 6
Generate my Tome vs Gamma comparison deck with AnyGen → Export to PowerPoint, Google Slides or PDF · No watermark on free tier

Tome vs Gamma: which one should you pick?

As of June 2026, Gamma is the safer choice if you need a tool you can buy today with published pricing, monthly AI credits, and exports (PDF, PNG, PPTX). “Tome” is harder to recommend because the original Tome presentation product is widely reported as discontinued in 2025, so your decision often becomes: Gamma vs a different modern alternative, or Gamma vs “legacy Tome” if you’re migrating old links/PDFs.

If your real requirement is “I need an editable PowerPoint (.pptx) deliverable,” prioritize tools that explicitly support PPTX export and warn you about fidelity limits. Gamma documents this (including watermark behavior and export caveats) in its help center (Oct 2025).

Rule of thumb (June 2026): If you need PPTX export and a currently maintained product, start with Gamma. If you’re trying to keep old Tome pages alive, treat Tome as a legacy format and plan a migration path (PDF + rebuild) instead of a fresh purchase decision.

Is Tome still available in 2026 (and which “Tome” do people mean)?

“Tome” is ambiguous in 2026. The original Tome AI storytelling/presentation product was historically on tome.app, but tome.app currently returns a 404 when fetched directly (June 22, 2026). Multiple third-party pages also state the original presentation product was discontinued in 2025, which changes the meaning of “tome vs gamma” from a normal head-to-head into an “active product vs legacy product” comparison.

A separate site at tomeapp.com currently shows pricing for a product called “Tome Plus” and “Tome Exclusive” with $10/month (monthly) and $7/month billed annually ($80/year). That offering appears to be a different product category than the original AI presentation tool, so don’t assume it’s the same “Tome” you used for decks.

  • If you mean the original Tome presentation product: plan for migration and avoid relying on it for new work.
  • If you mean a newer product marketed as “Tome App” today: confirm what it actually creates (slides vs documents vs courses) before comparing it to Gamma.
  • If your core need is still “AI presentations with exports”: compare Gamma against other active slide tools as well, not only Tome.
Practical takeaway: before you compare features, validate the product identity by checking the domain, export formats, and whether it can produce the deliverable you need (PPTX, PDF, share link).

Pricing and AI credits: what you can verify (June 2026)

Gamma publishes current plan pricing and monthly credit limits on its official pricing page (June 2026). For Tome, current official pricing for the original presentation product isn’t available from tome.app (404), so the only numeric pricing you’ll commonly see is from older third-party comparisons (date-stamped below) or from other products using the Tome name.

Gamma pricing (official, June 2026)

PlanPrice (annual billing)Monthly creditsCards per promptNotable inclusions
Free$0400 at signup (do not refill)Up to 10Import PDF/PPTX; export PDF/PPTX/PNG/Google Slides; watermark on exports from free accounts
Plus$9/seat/month ($108/seat/year)1,000/monthUp to 20Remove Gamma branding; advanced AI image models
Pro$18/seat/month ($216/seat/year)4,000/monthUp to 60Custom branding & fonts; analytics; custom domains (up to 10); API access; workspace templates
Ultra$90/seat/month ($1,080/seat/year)20,000/monthUp to 75Access to most advanced AI models (text, image, video); custom domains (up to 100); early access

Source note: the Gamma pricing page also mentions Team and Business plans in FAQ context (with 6,000 and 10,000 credits/seat/month respectively), but doesn’t show full pricing details in the main plan table (June 2026).

Tome pricing you may see (but date-stamp it)

  • Older comparison (Plus AI blog, Oct 9, 2024) lists Tome as $20/user/month monthly or $16/user/month annual. Treat this as historical unless you can verify an official current Tome pricing page for the same product.
  • A different “Tome” product at tomeapp.com lists $10/month (monthly) for “Tome Plus” and $7/month billed annually ($80/year) for “Tome Exclusive” (pricing page fetched June 2026). This appears unrelated to the legacy Tome presentation tool.
Buying decision tip: if the “Tome” pricing you’re looking at does not mention slides, decks, or exports like PPTX/PDF for presentations, you’re probably looking at a different product than the one people historically compared to Gamma.

Exports and deliverables: PPTX vs PDF vs share link

For most “tome vs gamma” searches, the deciding factor is the deliverable: do you need an editable .pptx, a PDF, or just a web link? Gamma documents export formats (PDF, PNG, PowerPoint/PPTX) and known caveats in its help center (Oct 10, 2025). For Tome, multiple third-party sources claim there was no PowerPoint export at any plan level for the legacy product; treat that as reported behavior unless you can verify it in official Tome docs.

Gamma exports (official help center, Oct 2025)

  • Export formats: PDF, PNG, PowerPoint (PPTX).
  • Free accounts: exported presentations include a “Made with Gamma” watermark; paid plans remove it only when the doc originates from a paid workspace.
  • Fidelity caveat: exports match Present Mode, not Edit Mode; gradients and fonts may render differently depending on the viewer or installed fonts.
  • Large/long projects can fail to export; workaround is splitting content or compressing large images.

Tome exports (legacy product, reported by third parties)

  • A Presentations.ai comparison page claims the original Tome presentation product had no PowerPoint export and could be shared as read-only web pages or PDFs (page fetched June 2026).
  • If your workflow depends on PPTX editing in PowerPoint, treat “no PPTX export” as a hard blocker and pick Gamma (or another tool with explicit PPTX export) instead.
Fast decision: Need editable PPTX? Prefer Gamma (officially supports PPTX export). OK with PDF or link-only publishing? A tile/document tool may work, but only if it’s active and you can still access it.

Editing model: cards/tile-docs vs slide decks (and why it matters)

Even when both tools are described as “AI presentations,” they don’t feel the same. Gamma is built around cards you can present, publish, and export. Legacy Tome is widely described as tile-based web documents that you publish as a page. This difference affects how you revise content, how you present live, and whether your team can standardize layouts.

What Gamma’s model enables (based on official product pages + help docs)

  • Prompt-to-deck with a hard cap per prompt (10/20/60/75 cards depending on plan, June 2026 pricing page).
  • Team/brand control at higher tiers: custom fonts and branding listed on Pro (June 2026 pricing page).
  • Export workflows (PDF/PNG/PPTX) with documented caveats (Oct 2025 help article).

What a tile/doc model typically optimizes (legacy Tome, reported)

  • Sharing a polished narrative as a web link (like a mini web page).
  • Embedding rich media blocks (depending on the product).
  • Less emphasis on “PowerPoint-perfect” editing after export, especially if PPTX export is missing.
If you present in Zoom or meetings using a slide deck and need last-minute edits in PowerPoint, favor a slide/export-first tool (Gamma) over a publish-a-page tool.

Which should I use for my use case (decision matrix)?

Use this matrix the way you’d use a procurement checklist: choose based on your required output and constraints. It deliberately treats “Tome” as a legacy/ambiguous product in 2026 because tome.app is inaccessible (404) and the original product is widely reported as discontinued.

Use case / requirementPick Gamma when…Pick Tome when… (only if available)
Editable PowerPoint deliverableYou must export PPTX and optionally tweak in PowerPoint; Gamma supports PPTX export (help article, Oct 2025).Only if the Tome product you mean explicitly supports PPTX export (not verified for legacy Tome).
Need predictable pricing + monthly AI creditsYou need published plan pricing and monthly credits (1,000 / 4,000 / 20,000 on paid tiers, June 2026).Only if you can find an official current pricing page for the same Tome product you’re evaluating (legacy Tome not verifiable).
Brand control (fonts, domains)You need custom fonts/branding and custom domain publishing (listed on Gamma Pro+, June 2026).Only if the specific Tome product has comparable brand controls you can verify.
Share as a web page linkYou want both: web sharing plus exports (Gamma supports publish + export).If you specifically want a tile-based published narrative page and don’t need PPTX.
Risk toleranceYou want an actively maintained product with accessible official docs and pricing.You’re maintaining legacy Tome assets and accept the risk of limited access/changes.
If your “Tome” evaluation can’t answer these three questions with official docs: (1) Is it available? (2) What does it export? (3) What does it cost? — default to Gamma.

Do “Tome vs Gamma” work faster with AnyGen (comparison + migration pack)

If your real job is to decide, justify, or migrate, AnyGen helps by turning your requirements and evidence into a clean, shareable “Tome vs Gamma” decision pack (plus a migration checklist) without you hand-formatting tables and slides. This is most useful when Tome is legacy and you need a practical plan rather than a theoretical feature list.

Copy-and-do: build a decision pack in 15 minutes

Migration reality check (if you used legacy Tome)

  • If you only have shared Tome links, capture screenshots/PDFs of the final state before access changes.
  • If you need editable slides, plan a rebuild: PDF is a viewing format, not an editing format.
  • Use Gamma’s export caveats (fonts/gradients/long docs) as a QA checklist when converting to PPTX.
AnyGen is most valuable here when you need a decision artifact (tables, matrix, checklist) that stays consistent between page and slides.

Frequently asked questions

tome vs gamma: which is better in 2026?

In June 2026, Gamma is easier to recommend because it’s active and publishes pricing, credit limits, and export formats. Tome is ambiguous because tome.app appears inaccessible (404) and multiple third-party sources claim the original presentation product was discontinued in 2025.

Is Tome discontinued?

You can’t verify legacy Tome’s status from tome.app directly on June 22, 2026 (the domain returns 404 when fetched). A Presentations.ai comparison page states “Tome’s original presentation product was discontinued in 2025” (page fetched June 2026). Treat this as third-party reporting unless you can locate an official Tome statement.

Does Gamma export to PowerPoint (PPTX)?

Yes. Gamma’s help center says you can export to PowerPoint (PPTX), PDF, and PNG (article dated Oct 10, 2025). It also notes exports match Present Mode and may differ from Edit Mode.

Does Gamma put a watermark on exports?

Gamma’s help article (Oct 10, 2025) states exports from free accounts include a “Made with Gamma” watermark/logo, and it is removed for paid plans when the presentation originates from a paid workspace.

How much is Gamma in 2026?

Gamma’s official pricing page (June 2026) lists: Plus $9/seat/month billed annually ($108/year), Pro $18/seat/month billed annually ($216/year), Ultra $90/seat/month billed annually ($1,080/year), plus a Free plan.

How many AI credits do you get on Gamma?

Gamma’s official pricing page (June 2026) lists 1,000 monthly credits on Plus, 4,000 monthly credits on Pro, and 20,000 monthly credits on Ultra. The Free plan shows 400 credits at signup that do not refill.

What’s the biggest practical difference between Tome and Gamma?

For most buyers, it’s the deliverable. Gamma explicitly supports PPTX/PDF/PNG export (help article Oct 2025). Legacy Tome is widely described as tile-based published pages and is reported by third parties to lack PPTX export; also, its availability is unclear in 2026 because tome.app is inaccessible.

If I used Tome before, how do I migrate to Gamma?

Treat Tome as a legacy source: inventory your Tome links, export/capture PDFs or screenshots of the final state, then rebuild the important decks in Gamma and export to PPTX where needed. Use Gamma’s export caveats (fonts/gradients/long docs from its Oct 2025 help article) as your QA checklist.

Want a clean Tome vs Gamma decision pack you can share?

Use AnyGen to generate a comparison table, decision matrix, and migration checklist grounded in the exact facts you can verify today (with dates).

Generate my Tome vs Gamma comparison deck with AnyGen → Browse all templates